View source for Blueprint-partners-wilkins-coney

[[Image:Ivp-rji-logo.jpg|thumb|350px|left|[[http://informationvalet.wordpress.com The Information Valet Project]]]]
==The Information Valet Project:==
=<b>Blueprinting the shared user/value network</b>=
===December 3-5, 2008<br>Reynolds Journalism Institute<br>Columbia, Missouri===

[http://densmore.newshare.com/wiki/index.php/Blueprint HOME PAGE] . . . 
[http://densmore.newshare.com/wiki/index.php/Blueprint-partners PARTNER REPORTS INDEX] . . . .

==11/29/08: Exchange from Prof. Lee Wilkins to Lillie Coney (EPIC)==

Lee Wilkin's writes: 

CONTRIBUTION: A framing of the privacy questions the project raises through
two disciplines--philosophy (what privacy adds to human flourishing) and law
(why privacy should be considered a post hoc restriction on intrusion)
connected by the concept of contested commodities--in other words, if there
are elements of our individual privacy we are willing to part with for a
price and under certain restrictions. Then, an explanation of a national
research effort that explores these issues empirically with multiple
generations in multiple venues, including public opinion polling, social
networking cites, and generational in-person surveys.

WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO LEARN: Which elements of personal privacy (assuming the
notion of contested commodities has some explanatory power) are most likely
to be subject to regulations and on what level. For example, if I were to
bet money (my usual wager is one-tenth of a dollar), I would bet people will
want regulation surrounding the issues of medical records and financial
records. However, I think there ought to be some discussion of regulations
an engineering specs for default settings on various cites (open is not
always better) and on aggregators. I also think there ought to be some
discussion of how poverty exacerbates many of these questions.