Tnj-consensus: Difference between revisions
From IVP Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
=<br>Consensus statement work= | =<br>Consensus statement work= | ||
*What consensus statement(s) could foster collaborative action toward a community-sustaining “new stories” ecosystem? | |||
#1. Define the ecosystem in terms of principles | |||
#2. Identify actions that embody those principles | |||
==Properties essential to a sustainable system== | |||
===Properties of Outlets=== | |||
#Journalistic Ethics (Accuracy and credibility. Need to be able to convince the public of shared set of facts.) -> How to measure good journalism | |||
#Sustainable revenue models | |||
#Community on all sides (Readers, funders) | |||
#Editors that prioritize news that serves the community. | |||
#Journalists that wish to empower and educate. | |||
#Diverse funding sources -> Can news be considered a utility? | |||
#Strong firewalls | |||
#Diversity in where journalists come from and see themselves (citizen, professional) | |||
#Adequate audience | |||
#Risk-taking outlets / go against the zeitgeist and public opinion | |||
#Outlets take on a diversity of roles | |||
<ul><ul> | |||
* Communication between government and the public | |||
</ul></ul> | |||
===Properties of Institutions within the ecosystem being studied=== | |||
#Transparency of the institutions they are holding accountable | |||
===Properties of the readers=== | |||
#High readership | |||
#High civic literacy - Media literate public (SUNY, Queens University) | |||
#High Digital literacy | |||
#High civic engagement (since it drags everything else along with it.) | |||
<ul><ul> | |||
* Relevance - You cover the right story | |||
* You offer media literacy | |||
* Diversity - Natural diversity of voices | |||
* Institutional transparency | |||
* Civic Health | |||
</ul></ul> | |||
===Properties of the ecosystem=== | |||
#Channels to share content | |||
#Number and diversity of voices | |||
#Diverse funding sources | |||
#Audience concentrators / mechanisms to gain reach. | |||
#Reward Risktaking | |||
#Instability / experimentation. | |||
<small><i>Authored by Tom Glaisyer</i></small> | |||
[http://journalismthatmatters.org/newjournalism/closing-commitments/ '''BACK TO CLOSING COMMITMENTS'''] | |||
[[Category:Tnj]] | [[Category:Tnj]] | ||
[[Category:Tnj-readings]] | [[Category:Tnj-readings]] | ||
Latest revision as of 03:45, 5 April 2013
REGISTER NOW. / CONFERENCE HOME PAGE / WIKI PAGE DIRECTORY
Consensus statement work
- What consensus statement(s) could foster collaborative action toward a community-sustaining “new stories” ecosystem?
- 1. Define the ecosystem in terms of principles
- 2. Identify actions that embody those principles
Properties essential to a sustainable system
Properties of Outlets
- Journalistic Ethics (Accuracy and credibility. Need to be able to convince the public of shared set of facts.) -> How to measure good journalism
- Sustainable revenue models
- Community on all sides (Readers, funders)
- Editors that prioritize news that serves the community.
- Journalists that wish to empower and educate.
- Diverse funding sources -> Can news be considered a utility?
- Strong firewalls
- Diversity in where journalists come from and see themselves (citizen, professional)
- Adequate audience
- Risk-taking outlets / go against the zeitgeist and public opinion
- Outlets take on a diversity of roles
- Communication between government and the public
Properties of Institutions within the ecosystem being studied
- Transparency of the institutions they are holding accountable
Properties of the readers
- High readership
- High civic literacy - Media literate public (SUNY, Queens University)
- High Digital literacy
- High civic engagement (since it drags everything else along with it.)
- Relevance - You cover the right story
- You offer media literacy
- Diversity - Natural diversity of voices
- Institutional transparency
- Civic Health
Properties of the ecosystem
- Channels to share content
- Number and diversity of voices
- Diverse funding sources
- Audience concentrators / mechanisms to gain reach.
- Reward Risktaking
- Instability / experimentation.
Authored by Tom Glaisyer