Rji-pivot-resources: Difference between revisions

From IVP Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 35: Line 35:
*There is a strong desire to discover new ways of providing information in compelling ways that enable people to take action either in their public or private lives
*There is a strong desire to discover new ways of providing information in compelling ways that enable people to take action either in their public or private lives
*The meeting should generate a design framework that leads to experiments and projects undertaken subsequently by the group members 
*The meeting should generate a design framework that leads to experiments and projects undertaken subsequently by the group members 
*We would like to focus on the question -- what can we do better together?</h4>
*We would like to focus on the question -- what can we do better together?
</ul></ul>
</ul>
[[Image:Rji-pivot-working-groups-tuesday.jpg|450px|thumb|right|]]
[[Image:Rji-pivot-working-groups-tuesday.jpg|450px|thumb|right|]]



Revision as of 11:46, 1 July 2012

RJI Pivot Point-Chicago / June 26-27, 2012 / OVERVIEW & RESOURCE LINKS

Links, background, outcomes and next steps for a project-based gathering of the Reynolds Journalism Institute

Working reports tag cloud

KEY TERMS: Communties, engagement, authorship vs. co-creation, journalism, relevance, trust, curation, narrative/story-telling vs. data/information, data ownership, aggregation, disaggregation, "the industry", partner or partnerhsips, institutional authority vs. collective intelligence, bias, disintermediation, competition, hyper-local, actionable information, content.

SEVEN PROJECTS

WHO PARTICIPATED

WORKING GROUP BULLET-POINT REPORTS: DAY ONE

FLIP PAD VISUALS: TRENDS, INDUSTRY FORCES AND MARKET FORCES


GETTING STARTED: PRECONVENING

http://www.flickr.com/photos/infovalet/sets/72157630144267624/